Friday, March 18, 2011

How To Wire An Active Sub

A MARKET WITH "EMPLOYED UNEMPLOYED" by Luis de Azcarate Diz Act

know that the title is contradictory, difficult to understand, but I hope the reader in the end, I understand.
little article In other reason and I said, something well known: he who buys a product or service, pay-to pay the price, all costs plus a profit, which is pocketed by the employer, is that "your benefit. "
reasonable and I said that employers are interested in the whole available workforce, work, it is the only way to provide surplus value, ie "their benefit." So employers are concerned that there is no unemployment, which would mean that the purchasing power of the market would rise to a maximum. is to create a Solidarity Fund con un porcentaje del beneficio que sirva para restablecer la capacidad de compra que tendrían los parados si estuviesen trabajando. Con esto se acabaría con el efecto del paro en la capacidad de compra del mercado nacional. La pregunta es: ¿en las condiciones actuales de 20 por ciento de parados -4,2 millones- es esto posible o no pasa de ser un buen deseo?.
Veamos lo que nos dicen los números y simplifico las cantidades para facilitar la comprensión de lo que expongo. Todas las cantidades están referidas a datos del Instituto de Estadísticas.
Tomemos datos del año 2009. Año de plena crisis y datos confirmados.

Wages were 500,000 million eu.

I can assume that the "unemployed" have a similar composition in their wages. Therefore these would reach 20 percent of the above sum, ie 100,000 million eu.

benefits totaled 450,000 million entrepreneurs eu.

If these benefits eu gather the 100,000 million., I have the possibility of increasing the purchasing power of all the unemployed, as if they were working and receiving a salary similar to that received by those who are not unemployed.

is easy to understand that if a situation is reached described, without precedent in history, the revival of the economy would be very large and immediate. Market demand would exceed supply leading to increased production and creating jobs and new businesses with products and services that would have a guaranteed market
, which would benefit the "surplus value" of entrepreneurs. It could also have an important effect: to TRUST that both the market needs.

Against the trend of rising prices, should act, with a firm hand the authorities. Decreasing the

unemployment, the necessary funds would decrease too, but should always ensure full purchasing power of the market.

Obviously, what I propose is as 'victims' employers.





But let, with the numbers, which may occur. The "ratio" between benefits and wages is: 450dividido between 500, ie 0.9. I have the right to assume that this amount be maintained if I invest 100,000 million in wages for the unemployed, which would give a benefit to employers of 90,000 million. Ie that consists of the operation would be 10,000 million. In that amount would reduce benefits: Eu 440,000 million, a 2.3 lower. So we are "victims to some extent."

If the business class act that way voluntarily, prestigiarían to citizens and offset the bad reputation they enjoy with the shields millionaires for their salaries and retirements. If employers

creasen the Solidarity Fund to help them understand the role that modern society should play the company, and vital cell of the development progress of society, contrary to the concept of "my property ; to squeeze fellow citizens and get me rich.


Luis Says Azcárate



0 comments:

Post a Comment