Enrique Ruano living memory of the impunity of Franco
Monday, March 21, 2011
Public Provident Fund Vs Mutual Funds
is pleased to invite you to the presentation of the book Enrique
Ruano living memory of the impunity of Franco
Editorial Complutense, 2011
Speakers: Berzosa
Carlos Alonso-Martinez , Rector of the UCM
►
Ariel Jerez Novara , Dean of Students, Technology and University Extension School Political Science and Sociology ► Margot Ruano Casanova, sister of Enrique Ruano ► Ana Domínguez Rama , editor book and researcher at the Complutense Special Chair "Historical Memory of the twentieth century" Moderator: Julio Aróstegui
Sánchez, Director of Special Chair Complutense Memory
Historical Twentieth Century " Thursday, March 24, 2011, at 19:00
Sánchez, Director of Special Chair Complutense Memory
Historical Twentieth Century " Thursday, March 24, 2011, at 19:00
Historical Library" Marqués de Valdecilla "(Universidad Complutense de Madrid)
Hall Actos
C / Novitiate, 3 (Metro Novitiate) Hall Actos
Friday, March 18, 2011
How To Wire An Active Sub
A MARKET WITH "EMPLOYED UNEMPLOYED" by Luis de Azcarate Diz Act
Veamos lo que nos dicen los números y simplifico las cantidades para facilitar la comprensión de lo que expongo. Todas las cantidades están referidas a datos del Instituto de Estadísticas.
Tomemos datos del año 2009. Año de plena crisis y datos confirmados.
Wages were 500,000 million eu.
I can assume that the "unemployed" have a similar composition in their wages. Therefore these would reach 20 percent of the above sum, ie 100,000 million eu.
benefits totaled 450,000 million entrepreneurs eu.
If these benefits eu gather the 100,000 million., I have the possibility of increasing the purchasing power of all the unemployed, as if they were working and receiving a salary similar to that received by those who are not unemployed.
is easy to understand that if a situation is reached described, without precedent in history, the revival of the economy would be very large and immediate. Market demand would exceed supply leading to increased production and creating jobs and new businesses with products and services that would have a guaranteed market
, which would benefit the "surplus value" of entrepreneurs. It could also have an important effect: to TRUST that both the market needs.
Against the trend of rising prices, should act, with a firm hand the authorities. Decreasing the
unemployment, the necessary funds would decrease too, but should always ensure full purchasing power of the market.
Obviously, what I propose is as 'victims' employers.
But let, with the numbers, which may occur. The "ratio" between benefits and wages is: 450dividido between 500, ie 0.9. I have the right to assume that this amount be maintained if I invest 100,000 million in wages for the unemployed, which would give a benefit to employers of 90,000 million. Ie that consists of the operation would be 10,000 million. In that amount would reduce benefits: Eu 440,000 million, a 2.3 lower. So we are "victims to some extent."
If the business class act that way voluntarily, prestigiarían to citizens and offset the bad reputation they enjoy with the shields millionaires for their salaries and retirements. If employers
creasen the Solidarity Fund to help them understand the role that modern society should play the company, and vital cell of the development progress of society, contrary to the concept of "my property ; to squeeze fellow citizens and get me rich.
Tomemos datos del año 2009. Año de plena crisis y datos confirmados.
Wages were 500,000 million eu.
I can assume that the "unemployed" have a similar composition in their wages. Therefore these would reach 20 percent of the above sum, ie 100,000 million eu.
benefits totaled 450,000 million entrepreneurs eu.
If these benefits eu gather the 100,000 million., I have the possibility of increasing the purchasing power of all the unemployed, as if they were working and receiving a salary similar to that received by those who are not unemployed.
is easy to understand that if a situation is reached described, without precedent in history, the revival of the economy would be very large and immediate. Market demand would exceed supply leading to increased production and creating jobs and new businesses with products and services that would have a guaranteed market
, which would benefit the "surplus value" of entrepreneurs. It could also have an important effect: to TRUST that both the market needs.
Against the trend of rising prices, should act, with a firm hand the authorities. Decreasing the
unemployment, the necessary funds would decrease too, but should always ensure full purchasing power of the market.
Obviously, what I propose is as 'victims' employers.
But let, with the numbers, which may occur. The "ratio" between benefits and wages is: 450dividido between 500, ie 0.9. I have the right to assume that this amount be maintained if I invest 100,000 million in wages for the unemployed, which would give a benefit to employers of 90,000 million. Ie that consists of the operation would be 10,000 million. In that amount would reduce benefits: Eu 440,000 million, a 2.3 lower. So we are "victims to some extent."
If the business class act that way voluntarily, prestigiarían to citizens and offset the bad reputation they enjoy with the shields millionaires for their salaries and retirements. If employers
creasen the Solidarity Fund to help them understand the role that modern society should play the company, and vital cell of the development progress of society, contrary to the concept of "my property ; to squeeze fellow citizens and get me rich.
Luis Says Azcárate
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
How To Reinstall Rhinoceros Evalutation
The right to have rights in Mexico
One of the most important critical events that take place in Latin America on the right are the "Critical Legal Conferences" that for several years been conducted in the University National Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM) and next year will be held in the Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Event-driven magazine Legal Review and study groups that coordinates and promotes Dr. Carlos Correa, such as the Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Sciences and Humanities. This year, the conference had as central the Criminalization of Social Protest and invited us to participate and to open these V Latin American Conference held in of Mexico City during the days 18 and 22 October. There was the partner Esteban Rodriguez, director of "The right to have rights" topic " Criminalization of Protest: Freedom of expression, social activism and political closure." He also introduced the Human Rights Manual for social organizations "The right to have rights" and the documentary "Marche prisoner" productos realizados por el equipo de extensionistas de la UNLP. Las jornadas fueron un ámbito propicio para conocer otras problemáticas e intercambiar experiencias y materiales informativos. Así mismo, pudimos conocer a los compañeros de la Revista REDHES (Revista de Derechos Humanos y Estudios Sociales); a los amigos del Colectivo RADAR , un colectivo de estudios alternativos en derecho, y a los abogados militantes del Centro PRODH (Centro de Derechos Humanos Miguel Agustín Pro Juárez) que además de asumir la defensa de militantes procesados en distintas partes de México (Guerrero, Oaxaca, etc.), y de denunciar el uso de la tortura y las systematic repression of social movements by the different public forces in the Mexican state, are taking as a problem and trying out alternative responses to the question of "security," violence and social conflict. We also highlight the human rights manual for indigenous people and peasants who have recently published and distributed.
Inaugural Conference of the conference with Daniel Sandoval Cervantes
Carlos Correa and Esteban Rodríguez
With peers PRODH Center
With fellow Collective
RADAR The auditorium of the Conference
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)